emailNeed to contact me and don't have my email? Click on email button.
Welcome to eWillys.com, a website for vintage jeep enthusiasts. I update this website nearly every day with jeep deals, jeep history, interesting reader projects, jeep related info, and more.
These quick searches can help you find things on eBay. People list in the wrong categories all the time, so don't be surprised to see brochures in the parts area for example.
The links to posts below show jeeps grouped by models, condition, and other ways. Some of these jeeps are for sale and others have been sold. If you are unsure whether a vehicle is still for sale or not, email me at d [at] ewillys.com for more info.
There are plenty of interesting, unusual, historic and surprising stories related to Jeeps and their owners. In addition, some of these features have nothing to do with jeeps. This link will display all featured stories starting from the latest.
Looking for parts and not sure where to go? There are a variety of large and small new and used parts sellers both online and offline.
Importantly, the allure of buying a project jeep can be romantic. The reality of restoring a jeep can be quite different, expensive and overwhelming without the right tools and resources. So, tread carefully when purchasing a "project". If you have any concerns about buying a vintage jeep, or run across a scam, feel free to contact me for help, comments or concerns .
UPDATE: **SOLD** Was No Price.
(10/16/2014) The VIN is incorrect. Appears solid.
“VIN: J249339
Stock #: 3090
Condition: Used
Exterior: Green
Interior: Green
Body: Convertible
Transmission: 3-Speed Manual
Engine: FLAT HEAD”
I realize that this is probably a show piece but why in the world would they think to mount a rifle rack there.
Gave them a call a couple days ago and was told that they are looking for about $30,000.00. said that they had paperwork that shows that the jeep was at Normandy. A little rich for my blood.
Thanks for the update Frank.
this one comes up every so often. They are awful proud of it.
For that kind of money, I would expect it to be completely correct. This one has several issues.